Loading…
None
String updated in the repository |
|
None
String updated in the repository |
<p><strong>URL: </strong></p>
<h2>@FAO 2016-2021. Sustainable Development Goals. Indicator 14.4.1 - Proportion of fish stocks within biologically sustainable levels. <a href="http://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/indicators/1441/en/">http://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/indicators/1441/en/</a> </h2> <p>@FAO 2019-2021. SDG 14.4.1 eLearning course. <a href="https://elearning.fao.org/course/view.php?id=502">https://elearning.fao.org/course/view.php?id=502</a></p> <p>@FAO 2015-2021. CWP handbook of fishery statistical standards. Fishing areas for statistical purpose. <a href="http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/fishing-areas-for-statistical-purposes/en/">http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/fishing-areas-for-statistical-purposes/en/</a></p> <p>@FAO 2015-2021. CWP handbook of fishery statistical standards. Identifiers for aquatic animals and plants: <a href="http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/identifiers-for-aquatic-animals-and-plants/en/">http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/identifiers-for-aquatic-animals-and-plants/en/</a></p> <p>@FAO 2004-2021. FIRMS Information Management Policy - Annex 1.2 - List of reference terms for Marine Resources. Updated June 2019. http://www.fao.org/3/a-ax530e.pdf</p> <p><strong>References:</strong></p> <p>Branch, T.A., Jensen, O.P., Ricard, D., Ye, Y. & Hilborn, R. (2011) Contrasting global trends in marine fishery status obtained from catches and from stock assessments. Conservation Biology, 25: 777–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01687.x.</p> <p>FAO (1995) Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. 41 pp.</p> <p>FAO (2005) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 457. Rome. 235 pp</p> <p>FAO (2011) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO technical paper 569: http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2389e/i2389e00.htm.</p> <p>UN (1995) Agreement for the implementation of the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. 40 pp.</p> <p>Appendix 1</p> <p>Guidelines to establish reference list of stocks.</p> <p>The reference list compiles a list of fish stocks based on data from the considered area, i.e. a country’s EEZ and/or territorial waters and/or possibly the competence area of a regional fisheries management organization. This list of fish stocks will ideally include existing Assessment units or Management units, and also possibly other unassessed fish stocks that are fished in a given country. The list will exclude stocks straddling in the high seas, mostly tuna and tuna-like species.</p> <p>This list should:</p> <ol> <li>Represent at least 60% (a higher percent is preferred when possible) of the national total landed and/or reported catch (Total in Tonnes excluding landings from straddling stocks). Information should be provided on all of the stocks that contribute to this top 60% (or more) of landings regardless of whether their status is known. Stocks should be input from left to right on the spreadsheet in the order of the largest to smallest total landings for each stock, by Tonnes. Species with multiple different stocks should be input as separate stocks. </li> <li>Contain stocks of major importance in terms of catch, ecosystem role, economic value, and social/cultural considerations. If possible, the list should represent stocks of each of these categories for a given country. For example, care should be taken to include fish stocks that are important to small-scale fisheries as well as large-scale industrial fisheries. Consideration for these different categories will vary between countries.</li> <li>Remain unchanged (i.e. for at least 5 years) to better reflect changes in stock status at the national level and minimize the effect of changing the reference list of stocks (i.e., adding, deleting, merging stocks) into the SDG indicator. This will ensure consistency in the indicator calculation and better reflect fish stock sustainability over time.</li> </ol> <p>Appendix 2</p> <p>Complete list of questions to countries to inform the indicator. Pink cells are mandatory, white cells are optional. </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1. REFERENCE LIST OF FISH STOCKS & STATUS</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1.1 Stock Name</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>1.2 Stock Jurisdictional distribution</strong></p> <p><strong>(Please type "X" in the relevant box)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>National</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Shared between Nations</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1.3 For shared stocks only, please list the exploiting countries</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1.4 Please indicate whether the stock is Assessed (Yes) or Unassessed (No)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>1.5 Method of assessment</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>If "Yes" assessed, please indicate which approach was used: (1) Classic; (2) Data-limited ; (3) Unspecified</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>If "No" please indicate best available knowledge used to define stock status (e.g. trends over catch rates or abundance index)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>1.6 Current stock status</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Indicate whether the stock is biologically sustainable (Yes or No)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Assessment year</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Indicate source references of the official stock assessment or other information, including web links to online documents when available</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>1.7 Total landings for the entire stock</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Landings (in tonnes)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Reference year</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Proportion of total landings from the total national landings (excluding landings from straddling stocks) (in percentage)</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="3"> <p><strong>2.1 STOCK INDIVIDUAL INFORMATION</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.1 Stock name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Name of the individual stock</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.2 Scientific name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Species scientific name, preferably according to ASFIS List of Species for Fishery Statistics Purposes</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" rowspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.3 Common name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Species common name in English (if available)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Species common name in local language (list more than one if relevant)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" rowspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.4 FAO Major Fishing Area/ with sub-levels when appropriate</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Indicate the code of the FAO major fishing area</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Indicate the code of the area sub-levels where appropriate</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" rowspan="3"> <p><strong>2.1.5 Stock is considered as ...</strong></p> <p><strong>(possible to select multiple answers, place "X" in the relevant cell(s))</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>... Assessment Unit (for stocks with an available official stock assessment)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>… Management Unit (Unit that is used to implement management measures based on a stock assessment or not)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>… Other (i.e., Species x Area) unit (if none of the above)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.8 Management Agency/Advisory Body</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Management agency or advisory body responsible for assessment (if assessment unit) or management (if management unit)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3"> <p><strong>2.2 ASSESSMENT INFORMATION</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.1 Assessment status (Yes, No)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Indicate whether the stock is Assessed (Yes) or Unassessed (No)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.2 Overfished (Yes, No, Unknown)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>The official stock assessment concludes "Overfished" with respect to abundance reference points (Yes, No, Unknown). Note: if stock is overfished then is not biologically sustainable (please answer NO in question Line 15, Section 1). When possible, support your answer with information on Section 2.3 (for example, current biomass is less than biomass target reference point)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.3 Overfishing (Yes, No, Unknown)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>The official stock assessment concludes "Overfishing" with respect to fishing mortality reference points (Yes, No, Unknown). Note: see e-learning course on how to link fishing mortality reference points to biological sustainability.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.4 Assessment method/software</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>If there is an official stock assessment available please indicate which method or software used. For example: stock synthesis; ASPIC, MULTIFAN-CL; VIT, CPUE trends, catch trends, size/length trends, none, others</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.5 Assessment availability (Yes, No)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>The assessment is publicly available (Yes or No)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.6 Source references</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>List of Source references used to collect information, including web links to online documents when available</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.7 Reliability (L/M/H)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>High (H) – Formal stock assessment at the regional, national or local levels forms the foundation of the classification of stock status;</p> <p>Medium (M) – Grey data/information and catch trend analysis provide the basis for the classification of stock status;</p> <p>Low (L) – Black data/information and qualitative assessment (e.g. experts judgement) were used for the classification of stock status</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3"> <p><strong>2.3 INPUT DATA</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Data availability (Yes, No)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Input data needed for the stock assessment</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="4"> <p><strong>2.3.1 Abundance</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Current Biomass</p> </td> <td> <p>Most recent biomass or abundance in tonnes (NA if not available)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Virgin/pristine stock biomass (B0)</p> </td> <td> <p>Value of the biomass or abundance target reference point in tonnes (i.e. prime stock biomass)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Target Reference Point type</p> </td> <td> <p>Type of biomass or abundance reference point used (e.g. 0.4B0; BMSY, etc. )</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Reference year</p> </td> <td> <p>Last year of input data used in the assessment (i.e. year of Current Biomass)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="4"> <p><strong>2.3.2 Fishing mortality</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Current F</p> </td> <td> <p>Most recent fishing mortality (F) or exploitation rate (U)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>F Reference Point</p> </td> <td> <p>Value of the fishing mortality reference point</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Reference Point type</p> </td> <td> <p>Type of fishing mortality reference point used (e.g. FMSY, F01, etc. )</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Reference year</p> </td> <td> <p>Last year of input data used in the assessment (i.e. year of Current F)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>2.3.3 CPUE</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Current CPUE</p> </td> <td> <p>Current value of catch per unit of effort</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Units of CPUE</p> </td> <td> <p>Unit (e.g. kg/trap), in case CPUE is not standardized</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Year of current CPUE</p> </td> <td> <p>Year of current CPUE</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>2.3.4 Catches</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Current catch</p> </td> <td> <p>Current value of catch (in tonnes)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Reference year</p> </td> <td> <p>Year of current catch</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Average Catch Max</p> </td> <td> <p>Value of maximum catch in the time series (in tonnes) (after 5 years smoothing)</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="12"> <p><strong>3. SUPPORTING TIME SERIES</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="12"> <p><strong><em><u>Time series are optional but recommended to be reported by stock fo all available years</u></em></strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Fish Stock ID</strong></p> </td> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Year</strong></p> </td> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Landings (in tonnes)</strong></p> </td> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Catches (in tonnes)</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Abundance</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>CPUE</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Exploitation rate</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Fishing Effort</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>METADATA</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>1. The reference list of stocks represent at least 60% of the current total national landed and/or reported catch statistics?</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>1a. If answered "No", please specify</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>2. The reference list of stocks contains all stocks of major importance in terms of catch, ecosystem role, economic value, and social/cultural considerations</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>3. Please indicate the frequency of stock assessment</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>3a. If answered "Other", please specify</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>2. If the SDG indicator 14.4.1 is reported in the national SDG portal, database, or other please indicate the address</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>2a. Please provide additional addresses if available</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>4. Any additional information:</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
<p>
<h2>@FAO 2016-2021. Sustainable Development Goals. Indicator 14.4.1 - Proportion of fish stocks within biologically sustainable levels. <a href="http://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/indicators/1441/en/">http://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/indicators/1441/en/</a> </h2> <p>@FAO 2019-2021. SDG 14.4.1 eLearning course. <a href="https://elearning.fao.org/course/view.php?id=502">https://elearning.fao.org/course/view.php?id=502</a></p> <p>@FAO 2015-2021. CWP handbook of fishery statistical standards. Fishing areas for statistical purpose. <a href="http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/fishing-areas-for-statistical-purposes/en/">http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/fishing-areas-for-statistical-purposes/en/</a></p> <p>@FAO 2015-2021. CWP handbook of fishery statistical standards. Identifiers for aquatic animals and plants: <a href="http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/identifiers-for-aquatic-animals-and-plants/en/">http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/identifiers-for-aquatic-animals-and-plants/en/</a></p> <p>@FAO 2004-2021. FIRMS Information Management Policy - Annex 1.2 - List of reference terms for Marine Resources. Updated June 2019. http://www.fao.org/3/a-ax530e.pdf</p> <p><strong>References:</strong></p> <p>Branch, T.A., Jensen, O.P., Ricard, D., Ye, Y. & Hilborn, R. (2011) Contrasting global trends in marine fishery status obtained from catches and from stock assessments. Conservation Biology, 25: 777–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01687.x.</p> <p>FAO (1995) Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. 41 pp.</p> <p>FAO (2005) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 457. Rome. 235 pp</p> <p>FAO (2011) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO technical paper 569: http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2389e/i2389e00.htm.</p> <p>UN (1995) Agreement for the implementation of the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. 40 pp.</p> <p>Appendix 1</p> <p>Guidelines to establish reference list of stocks.</p> <p>The reference list compiles a list of fish stocks based on data from the considered area, i.e. a country’s EEZ and/or territorial waters and/or possibly the competence area of a regional fisheries management organization. This list of fish stocks will ideally include existing Assessment units or Management units, and also possibly other unassessed fish stocks that are fished in a given country. The list will exclude stocks straddling in the high seas, mostly tuna and tuna-like species.</p> <p>This list should:</p> <ol> <li>Represent at least 60% (a higher percent is preferred when possible) of the national total landed and/or reported catch (Total in Tonnes excluding landings from straddling stocks). Information should be provided on all of the stocks that contribute to this top 60% (or more) of landings regardless of whether their status is known. Stocks should be input from left to right on the spreadsheet in the order of the largest to smallest total landings for each stock, by Tonnes. Species with multiple different stocks should be input as separate stocks. </li> <li>Contain stocks of major importance in terms of catch, ecosystem role, economic value, and social/cultural considerations. If possible, the list should represent stocks of each of these categories for a given country. For example, care should be taken to include fish stocks that are important to small-scale fisheries as well as large-scale industrial fisheries. Consideration for these different categories will vary between countries.</li> <li>Remain unchanged (i.e. for at least 5 years) to better reflect changes in stock status at the national level and minimize the effect of changing the reference list of stocks (i.e., adding, deleting, merging stocks) into the SDG indicator. This will ensure consistency in the indicator calculation and better reflect fish stock sustainability over time.</li> </ol> <p>Appendix 2</p> <p>Complete list of questions to countries to inform the indicator. Pink cells are mandatory, white cells are optional. </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1. REFERENCE LIST OF FISH STOCKS & STATUS</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1.1 Stock Name</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>1.2 Stock Jurisdictional distribution</strong></p> <p><strong>(Please type "X" in the relevant box)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>National</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Shared between Nations</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1.3 For shared stocks only, please list the exploiting countries</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>1.4 Please indicate whether the stock is Assessed (Yes) or Unassessed (No)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>1.5 Method of assessment</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>If "Yes" assessed, please indicate which approach was used: (1) Classic; (2) Data-limited ; (3) Unspecified</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>If "No" please indicate best available knowledge used to define stock status (e.g. trends over catch rates or abundance index)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>1.6 Current stock status</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Indicate whether the stock is biologically sustainable (Yes or No)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Assessment year</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Indicate source references of the official stock assessment or other information, including web links to online documents when available</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>1.7 Total landings for the entire stock</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Landings (in tonnes)</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Reference year</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Proportion of total landings from the total national landings (excluding landings from straddling stocks) (in percentage)</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="3"> <p><strong>2.1 STOCK INDIVIDUAL INFORMATION</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.1 Stock name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Name of the individual stock</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.2 Scientific name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Species scientific name, preferably according to ASFIS List of Species for Fishery Statistics Purposes</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" rowspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.3 Common name</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Species common name in English (if available)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Species common name in local language (list more than one if relevant)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" rowspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.4 FAO Major Fishing Area/ with sub-levels when appropriate</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Indicate the code of the FAO major fishing area</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Indicate the code of the area sub-levels where appropriate</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" rowspan="3"> <p><strong>2.1.5 Stock is considered as ...</strong></p> <p><strong>(possible to select multiple answers, place "X" in the relevant cell(s))</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>... Assessment Unit (for stocks with an available official stock assessment)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>… Management Unit (Unit that is used to implement management measures based on a stock assessment or not)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>… Other (i.e., Species x Area) unit (if none of the above)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.1.8 Management Agency/Advisory Body</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Management agency or advisory body responsible for assessment (if assessment unit) or management (if management unit)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3"> <p><strong>2.2 ASSESSMENT INFORMATION</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.1 Assessment status (Yes, No)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Indicate whether the stock is Assessed (Yes) or Unassessed (No)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.2 Overfished (Yes, No, Unknown)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>The official stock assessment concludes "Overfished" with respect to abundance reference points (Yes, No, Unknown). Note: if stock is overfished then is not biologically sustainable (please answer NO in question Line 15, Section 1). When possible, support your answer with information on Section 2.3 (for example, current biomass is less than biomass target reference point)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.3 Overfishing (Yes, No, Unknown)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>The official stock assessment concludes "Overfishing" with respect to fishing mortality reference points (Yes, No, Unknown). Note: see e-learning course on how to link fishing mortality reference points to biological sustainability.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.4 Assessment method/software</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>If there is an official stock assessment available please indicate which method or software used. For example: stock synthesis; ASPIC, MULTIFAN-CL; VIT, CPUE trends, catch trends, size/length trends, none, others</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.5 Assessment availability (Yes, No)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>The assessment is publicly available (Yes or No)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.6 Source references</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>List of Source references used to collect information, including web links to online documents when available</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>2.2.7 Reliability (L/M/H)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>High (H) – Formal stock assessment at the regional, national or local levels forms the foundation of the classification of stock status;</p> <p>Medium (M) – Grey data/information and catch trend analysis provide the basis for the classification of stock status;</p> <p>Low (L) – Black data/information and qualitative assessment (e.g. experts judgement) were used for the classification of stock status</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td></td> <td></td> <td></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3"> <p><strong>2.3 INPUT DATA</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Data availability (Yes, No)</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Input data needed for the stock assessment</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="4"> <p><strong>2.3.1 Abundance</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Current Biomass</p> </td> <td> <p>Most recent biomass or abundance in tonnes (NA if not available)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Virgin/pristine stock biomass (B0)</p> </td> <td> <p>Value of the biomass or abundance target reference point in tonnes (i.e. prime stock biomass)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Target Reference Point type</p> </td> <td> <p>Type of biomass or abundance reference point used (e.g. 0.4B0; BMSY, etc. )</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Reference year</p> </td> <td> <p>Last year of input data used in the assessment (i.e. year of Current Biomass)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="4"> <p><strong>2.3.2 Fishing mortality</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Current F</p> </td> <td> <p>Most recent fishing mortality (F) or exploitation rate (U)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>F Reference Point</p> </td> <td> <p>Value of the fishing mortality reference point</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Reference Point type</p> </td> <td> <p>Type of fishing mortality reference point used (e.g. FMSY, F01, etc. )</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Reference year</p> </td> <td> <p>Last year of input data used in the assessment (i.e. year of Current F)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>2.3.3 CPUE</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Current CPUE</p> </td> <td> <p>Current value of catch per unit of effort</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Units of CPUE</p> </td> <td> <p>Unit (e.g. kg/trap), in case CPUE is not standardized</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Year of current CPUE</p> </td> <td> <p>Year of current CPUE</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="3"> <p><strong>2.3.4 Catches</strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Current catch</p> </td> <td> <p>Current value of catch (in tonnes)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Reference year</p> </td> <td> <p>Year of current catch</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Average Catch Max</p> </td> <td> <p>Value of maximum catch in the time series (in tonnes) (after 5 years smoothing)</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="12"> <p><strong>3. SUPPORTING TIME SERIES</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="12"> <p><strong><em><u>Time series are optional but recommended to be reported by stock fo all available years</u></em></strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Fish Stock ID</strong></p> </td> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Year</strong></p> </td> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Landings (in tonnes)</strong></p> </td> <td rowspan="2"> <p><strong>Catches (in tonnes)</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Abundance</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>CPUE</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Exploitation rate</strong></p> </td> <td colspan="2"> <p><strong>Fishing Effort</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong>Unit</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>METADATA</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>1. The reference list of stocks represent at least 60% of the current total national landed and/or reported catch statistics?</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>1a. If answered "No", please specify</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>2. The reference list of stocks contains all stocks of major importance in terms of catch, ecosystem role, economic value, and social/cultural considerations</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>3. Please indicate the frequency of stock assessment</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>3a. If answered "Other", please specify</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>2. If the SDG indicator 14.4.1 is reported in the national SDG portal, database, or other please indicate the address</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>2a. Please provide additional addresses if available</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>4. Any additional information:</strong></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> |
Things to check
Key
OTHER_DOCFlags
ignore-inconsistent, read-only
<h2>FAO 2016-2021. Sustainable Development Goals. Indicator 14.4.1 - Proportion of fish stocks within biologically sustainable levels. <a href="http://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/indicators/1441/en/">http://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/indicators/1441/en/</a> </h2>
<p>FAO 2019-2021. SDG 14.4.1 eLearning course. <a href="https://elearning.fao.org/course/view.php?id=502">https://elearning.fao.org/course/view.php?id=502</a></p>
<p>FAO 2015-2021. CWP handbook of fishery statistical standards. Fishing areas for statistical purpose. <a href="https://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/main-water-areas/en/">https://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/main-water-areas/en/</a> </p>
<p>FAO 2015-2021. CWP handbook of fishery statistical standards. Identifiers for aquatic animals and plants: <a href="http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/identifiers-for-aquatic-animals-and-plants/en/">http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/identifiers-for-aquatic-animals-and-plants/en/</a></p>
<p>FAO 2004-2021. FIRMS Information Management Policy - Annex 1.2 - List of reference terms for Marine Resources. Updated June 2019. http://www.fao.org/3/a-ax530e.pdf</p>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<p>Branch, T.A., Jensen, O.P., Ricard, D., Ye, Y. & Hilborn, R. (2011) Contrasting global trends in marine fishery status obtained from catches and from stock assessments. Conservation Biology, 25: 777–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01687.x.</p>
<p>Caddy, J.R. and Mahon, R. (1995). Reference Points for fisheries management. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 337. Rome, FAO. 83p.</p>
<p>Cadima, E.L. (2003) Fish stock assessment manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 393. Rome, FAO. 161p.</p>
<p>FAO (1995) Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. 41 pp.</p>
<p>FAO (2005) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 457. Rome. 235 pp</p>
<p>FAO (2011) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO technical paper 569: <a href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2389e/i2389e00.htm">http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2389e/i2389e00.htm</a>. </p>
<p>Haddon, M. (2011). Modelling and Quantitative Methods in Fisheries 2nd Edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC. 465 p.</p>
<p>Hilborn, R., R.O. Amoroso, C.M. Anderson, J.K. Baum, T.A. Branch, C. Costello, C.L. de Moor, et al. 2020. “Effective Fisheries Management Instrumental in Improving Fish Stock Status.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117 (4): 2218–24. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/">https://doi.org/10.1073/</a> pnas.1909726116.</p>
<p>Sparre P. & Venema, S.C. (1998). Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Part 1. Manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 306.1, Rev. 2. Rome, FAO. 407p.</p>
<p>UN (1995) Agreement for the implementation of the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. 40 pp.</p>
<p>Appendix 1</p>
<p>Guidelines to establish reference list of stocks.</p>
<p>The reference list compiles a list of fish stocks based on data from the considered area, i.e. a country’s EEZ and/or territorial waters and/or possibly the competence area of a regional fisheries management organization. This list of fish stocks will ideally include existing Assessment units or Management units, and also possibly other unassessed fish stocks that are fished in a given country. The list will exclude stocks straddling in the high seas, mostly tuna and tuna-like species.</p>
<p>This list should:</p>
<ol>
<li>Represent at least 60% (a higher percent is preferred when possible) of the national total landed and/or reported catch (Total in Tonnes excluding landings from straddling stocks). Information should be provided on all of the stocks that contribute to this top 60% (or more) of landings regardless of whether their status is known. Stocks should be input from left to right on the spreadsheet in the order of the largest to smallest total landings for each stock, by Tonnes. Species with multiple different stocks should be input as separate stocks. </li>
<li>Contain stocks of major importance in terms of catch, ecosystem role, economic value, and social/cultural considerations. If possible, the list should represent stocks of each of these categories for a given country. For example, care should be taken to include fish stocks that are important to small-scale fisheries as well as large-scale industrial fisheries. Consideration for these different categories will vary between countries.</li>
<li>Remain unchanged (i.e. for at least 5 years) to better reflect changes in stock status at the national level and minimize the effect of changing the reference list of stocks (i.e., adding, deleting, merging stocks) into the SDG indicator. This will ensure consistency in the indicator calculation and better reflect fish stock sustainability over time.</li>
</ol>
<p>Appendix 2</p>
<p>Complete list of questions to countries to inform the indicator. Pink cells are mandatory, white cells are optional. </p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>1. REFERENCE LIST OF FISH STOCKS & STATUS</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>1.1 Stock Name</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2">
<p><strong>1.2 Stock Jurisdictional distribution</strong></p>
<p><strong>(Please type "X" in the relevant box)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>National</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Shared between Nations</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>1.3 For shared stocks only, please list the exploiting countries</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>1.4 Please indicate whether the stock is Assessed (Yes) or Unassessed (No)</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2">
<p><strong>1.5 Method of assessment</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>If "Yes" assessed, please indicate which approach was used: (1) Classic; (2) Data-limited ; (3) Unspecified</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>If "No" please indicate best available knowledge used to define stock status (e.g. trends over catch rates or abundance index)</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3">
<p><strong>1.6 Current stock status</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Indicate whether the stock is biologically sustainable (Yes or No)</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Assessment year</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Indicate source references of the official stock assessment or other information, including web links to online documents when available</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3">
<p><strong>1.7 Total landings for the entire stock</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Landings (in tonnes)</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Reference year</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Proportion of total landings from the total national landings (excluding landings from straddling stocks) (in percentage)</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">
<p><strong>2.1 STOCK INDIVIDUAL INFORMATION</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.1.1 Stock name</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Name of the individual stock</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.1.2 Scientific name</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Species scientific name, preferably according to ASFIS List of Species for Fishery Statistics Purposes</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" rowspan="2">
<p><strong>2.1.3 Common name</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Species common name in English (if available)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Species common name in local language (list more than one if relevant)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" rowspan="2">
<p><strong>2.1.4 FAO Major Fishing Area/ with sub-levels when appropriate</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Indicate the code of the FAO major fishing area</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Indicate the code of the area sub-levels where appropriate</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" rowspan="3">
<p><strong>2.1.5 Stock is considered as ...</strong></p>
<p><strong>(possible to select multiple answers, place "X" in the relevant cell(s))</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>... Assessment Unit (for stocks with an available official stock assessment)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>… Management Unit (Unit that is used to implement management measures based on a stock assessment or not)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>… Other (i.e., Species x Area) unit (if none of the above)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.1.8 Management Agency/Advisory Body</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Management agency or advisory body responsible for assessment (if assessment unit) or management (if management unit)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">
<p><strong>2.2 ASSESSMENT INFORMATION</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.2.1 Assessment status (Yes, No)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Indicate whether the stock is Assessed (Yes) or Unassessed (No)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.2.2 Overfished (Yes, No, Unknown)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>The official stock assessment concludes "Overfished" with respect to abundance reference points (Yes, No, Unknown). Note: if stock is overfished then is not biologically sustainable (please answer NO in question Line 15, Section 1). When possible, support your answer with information on Section 2.3 (for example, current biomass is less than biomass target reference point)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.2.3 Overfishing (Yes, No, Unknown)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>The official stock assessment concludes "Overfishing" with respect to fishing mortality reference points (Yes, No, Unknown). Note: see e-learning course on how to link fishing mortality reference points to biological sustainability.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.2.4 Assessment method/software</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>If there is an official stock assessment available please indicate which method or software used. For example: stock synthesis; ASPIC, MULTIFAN-CL; VIT, CPUE trends, catch trends, size/length trends, none, others</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.2.5 Assessment availability (Yes, No)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>The assessment is publicly available (Yes or No)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.2.6 Source references</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>List of Source references used to collect information, including web links to online documents when available</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.2.7 Reliability (L/M/H)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>High (H) – Formal stock assessment at the regional, national or local levels forms the foundation of the classification of stock status;</p>
<p>Medium (M) – Grey data/information and catch trend analysis provide the basis for the classification of stock status;</p>
<p>Low (L) – Black data/information and qualitative assessment (e.g. experts judgement) were used for the classification of stock status</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">
<p><strong>2.3 INPUT DATA</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>Data availability (Yes, No)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Input data needed for the stock assessment</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4">
<p><strong>2.3.1 Abundance</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Current Biomass</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Most recent biomass or abundance in tonnes (NA if not available)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Virgin/pristine stock biomass (B0)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Value of the biomass or abundance target reference point in tonnes (i.e. prime stock biomass)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Target Reference Point type</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Type of biomass or abundance reference point used (e.g. 0.4B0; BMSY, etc. )</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Reference year</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Last year of input data used in the assessment (i.e. year of Current Biomass)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4">
<p><strong>2.3.2 Fishing mortality</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Current F</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Most recent fishing mortality (F) or exploitation rate (U)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>F Reference Point</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Value of the fishing mortality reference point</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Reference Point type</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Type of fishing mortality reference point used (e.g. FMSY, F01, etc. )</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Reference year</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Last year of input data used in the assessment (i.e. year of Current F)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3">
<p><strong>2.3.3 CPUE</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Current CPUE</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Current value of catch per unit of effort</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Units of CPUE</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Unit (e.g. kg/trap), in case CPUE is not standardized</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Year of current CPUE</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Year of current CPUE</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3">
<p><strong>2.3.4 Catches</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Current catch</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Current value of catch (in tonnes)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Reference year</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Year of current catch</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Average Catch Max</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Value of maximum catch in the time series (in tonnes) (after 5 years smoothing)</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="12">
<p><strong>3. SUPPORTING TIME SERIES</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="12">
<p><strong><em><u>Time series are optional but recommended to be reported by stock for all available years</u></em></strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2">
<p><strong>Fish Stock ID</strong></p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2">
<p><strong>Year</strong></p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2">
<p><strong>Landings (in tonnes)</strong></p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2">
<p><strong>Catches (in tonnes)</strong></p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>Abundance</strong></p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>CPUE</strong></p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>Exploitation rate</strong></p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>Fishing Effort</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Unit</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Unit</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Unit</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Unit</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>METADATA</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>1. The reference list of stocks represent at least 60% of the current total national landed and/or reported catch statistics?</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>1a. If answered "No", please specify</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>2. The reference list of stocks contains all stocks of major importance in terms of catch, ecosystem role, economic value, and social/cultural considerations</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>3. Please indicate the frequency of stock assessment</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>3a. If answered "Other", please specify</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>2. If the SDG indicator 14.4.1 is reported in the national SDG portal, database, or other please indicate the address</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>2a. Please provide additional addresses if available</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>4. Any additional information:</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>
@FAO 2016-2021. Sustainable Development Goals. Indicator 14.4.1 - Proportion of fish stocks within biologically sustainable levels. <a href="http://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/indicators/1441/en/">http://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/indicators/1441/en/</a> </h2><p>
@FAO 2019-2021. SDG 14.4.1 eLearning course. <a href="https://elearning.fao.org/course/view.php?id=502">https://elearning.fao.org/course/view.php?id=502</a></p><p>
@FAO 2015-2021. CWP handbook of fishery statistical standards. Fishing areas for statistical purpose. <a href="https://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/fishing-areas-for-statistical-purposemain-water-areas/en/">https://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/fishing-areas-for-statistical-purposemain-water-areas/en/</a> </p><p>
@FAO 2015-2021. CWP handbook of fishery statistical standards. Identifiers for aquatic animals and plants: <a href="http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/identifiers-for-aquatic-animals-and-plants/en/">http://www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/general-concepts/identifiers-for-aquatic-animals-and-plants/en/</a></p><p>
@FAO 2004-2021. FIRMS Information Management Policy - Annex 1.2 - List of reference terms for Marine Resources. Updated June 2019. http://www.fao.org/3/a-ax530e.pdf</p><p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<p>Branch, T.A., Jensen, O.P., Ricard, D., Ye, Y. & Hilborn, R. (2011) Contrasting global trends in marine fishery status obtained from catches and from stock assessments. Conservation Biology, 25: 777–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01687.x.</p>
<p>Caddy, J.R. and Mahon, R. (1995). Reference Points for fisheries management. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 337. Rome, FAO. 83p.</p>
<p>Cadima, E.L. (2003) Fish stock assessment manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 393. Rome, FAO. 161p.</p>
<p>FAO (1995) Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. 41 pp.</p>
<p>FAO (2005) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 457. Rome. 235 pp</p>
<p>FAO (2011) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO technical paper 569: <a href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2389e/i2389e00.htm">http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2389e/i2389e00.htm</a>. </p>
<p>Haddon, M. (2011). Modelling and Quantitative Methods in Fisheries 2nd Edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC. 465 p.</p>
<p>Hilborn, R., R.O. Amoroso, C.M. Anderson, J.K. Baum, T.A. Branch, C. Costello, C.L. de Moor, et al. 2020. “Effective Fisheries Management Instrumental in Improving Fish Stock Status.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117 (4): 2218–24. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/">https://doi.org/10.1073/</a> pnas.1909726116.</p>
<p>Sparre P. & Venema, S.C. (1998). Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Part 1. Manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 306.1, Rev. 2. Rome, FAO. 407p.</p>
<p>UN (1995) Agreement for the implementation of the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. 40 pp.</p>
<p>Appendix 1</p>
<p>Guidelines to establish reference list of stocks.</p>
<p>The reference list compiles a list of fish stocks based on data from the considered area, i.e. a country’s EEZ and/or territorial waters and/or possibly the competence area of a regional fisheries management organization. This list of fish stocks will ideally include existing Assessment units or Management units, and also possibly other unassessed fish stocks that are fished in a given country. The list will exclude stocks straddling in the high seas, mostly tuna and tuna-like species.</p>
<p>This list should:</p>
<ol>
<li>Represent at least 60% (a higher percent is preferred when possible) of the national total landed and/or reported catch (Total in Tonnes excluding landings from straddling stocks). Information should be provided on all of the stocks that contribute to this top 60% (or more) of landings regardless of whether their status is known. Stocks should be input from left to right on the spreadsheet in the order of the largest to smallest total landings for each stock, by Tonnes. Species with multiple different stocks should be input as separate stocks. </li>
<li>Contain stocks of major importance in terms of catch, ecosystem role, economic value, and social/cultural considerations. If possible, the list should represent stocks of each of these categories for a given country. For example, care should be taken to include fish stocks that are important to small-scale fisheries as well as large-scale industrial fisheries. Consideration for these different categories will vary between countries.</li>
<li>Remain unchanged (i.e. for at least 5 years) to better reflect changes in stock status at the national level and minimize the effect of changing the reference list of stocks (i.e., adding, deleting, merging stocks) into the SDG indicator. This will ensure consistency in the indicator calculation and better reflect fish stock sustainability over time.</li>
</ol>
<p>Appendix 2</p>
<p>Complete list of questions to countries to inform the indicator. Pink cells are mandatory, white cells are optional. </p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>1. REFERENCE LIST OF FISH STOCKS & STATUS</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>1.1 Stock Name</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2">
<p><strong>1.2 Stock Jurisdictional distribution</strong></p>
<p><strong>(Please type "X" in the relevant box)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>National</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Shared between Nations</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>1.3 For shared stocks only, please list the exploiting countries</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>1.4 Please indicate whether the stock is Assessed (Yes) or Unassessed (No)</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2">
<p><strong>1.5 Method of assessment</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>If "Yes" assessed, please indicate which approach was used: (1) Classic; (2) Data-limited ; (3) Unspecified</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>If "No" please indicate best available knowledge used to define stock status (e.g. trends over catch rates or abundance index)</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3">
<p><strong>1.6 Current stock status</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Indicate whether the stock is biologically sustainable (Yes or No)</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Assessment year</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Indicate source references of the official stock assessment or other information, including web links to online documents when available</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3">
<p><strong>1.7 Total landings for the entire stock</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Landings (in tonnes)</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Reference year</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Proportion of total landings from the total national landings (excluding landings from straddling stocks) (in percentage)</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">
<p><strong>2.1 STOCK INDIVIDUAL INFORMATION</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.1.1 Stock name</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Name of the individual stock</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.1.2 Scientific name</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Species scientific name, preferably according to ASFIS List of Species for Fishery Statistics Purposes</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" rowspan="2">
<p><strong>2.1.3 Common name</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Species common name in English (if available)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Species common name in local language (list more than one if relevant)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" rowspan="2">
<p><strong>2.1.4 FAO Major Fishing Area/ with sub-levels when appropriate</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Indicate the code of the FAO major fishing area</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Indicate the code of the area sub-levels where appropriate</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" rowspan="3">
<p><strong>2.1.5 Stock is considered as ...</strong></p>
<p><strong>(possible to select multiple answers, place "X" in the relevant cell(s))</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>... Assessment Unit (for stocks with an available official stock assessment)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>… Management Unit (Unit that is used to implement management measures based on a stock assessment or not)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>… Other (i.e., Species x Area) unit (if none of the above)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.1.8 Management Agency/Advisory Body</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Management agency or advisory body responsible for assessment (if assessment unit) or management (if management unit)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">
<p><strong>2.2 ASSESSMENT INFORMATION</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.2.1 Assessment status (Yes, No)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Indicate whether the stock is Assessed (Yes) or Unassessed (No)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.2.2 Overfished (Yes, No, Unknown)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>The official stock assessment concludes "Overfished" with respect to abundance reference points (Yes, No, Unknown). Note: if stock is overfished then is not biologically sustainable (please answer NO in question Line 15, Section 1). When possible, support your answer with information on Section 2.3 (for example, current biomass is less than biomass target reference point)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.2.3 Overfishing (Yes, No, Unknown)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>The official stock assessment concludes "Overfishing" with respect to fishing mortality reference points (Yes, No, Unknown). Note: see e-learning course on how to link fishing mortality reference points to biological sustainability.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.2.4 Assessment method/software</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>If there is an official stock assessment available please indicate which method or software used. For example: stock synthesis; ASPIC, MULTIFAN-CL; VIT, CPUE trends, catch trends, size/length trends, none, others</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.2.5 Assessment availability (Yes, No)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>The assessment is publicly available (Yes or No)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.2.6 Source references</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>List of Source references used to collect information, including web links to online documents when available</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>2.2.7 Reliability (L/M/H)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>High (H) – Formal stock assessment at the regional, national or local levels forms the foundation of the classification of stock status;</p>
<p>Medium (M) – Grey data/information and catch trend analysis provide the basis for the classification of stock status;</p>
<p>Low (L) – Black data/information and qualitative assessment (e.g. experts judgement) were used for the classification of stock status</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">
<p><strong>2.3 INPUT DATA</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>Data availability (Yes, No)</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Input data needed for the stock assessment</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4">
<p><strong>2.3.1 Abundance</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Current Biomass</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Most recent biomass or abundance in tonnes (NA if not available)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Virgin/pristine stock biomass (B0)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Value of the biomass or abundance target reference point in tonnes (i.e. prime stock biomass)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Target Reference Point type</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Type of biomass or abundance reference point used (e.g. 0.4B0; BMSY, etc. )</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Reference year</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Last year of input data used in the assessment (i.e. year of Current Biomass)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4">
<p><strong>2.3.2 Fishing mortality</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Current F</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Most recent fishing mortality (F) or exploitation rate (U)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>F Reference Point</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Value of the fishing mortality reference point</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Reference Point type</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Type of fishing mortality reference point used (e.g. FMSY, F01, etc. )</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Reference year</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Last year of input data used in the assessment (i.e. year of Current F)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3">
<p><strong>2.3.3 CPUE</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Current CPUE</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Current value of catch per unit of effort</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Units of CPUE</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Unit (e.g. kg/trap), in case CPUE is not standardized</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Year of current CPUE</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Year of current CPUE</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3">
<p><strong>2.3.4 Catches</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Current catch</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Current value of catch (in tonnes)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Reference year</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Year of current catch</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Average Catch Max</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Value of maximum catch in the time series (in tonnes) (after 5 years smoothing)</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="12">
<p><strong>3. SUPPORTING TIME SERIES</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="12">
<p><strong><em><u>Time series are optional but recommended to be reported by stock for all available years</u></em></strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2">
<p><strong>Fish Stock ID</strong></p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2">
<p><strong>Year</strong></p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2">
<p><strong>Landings (in tonnes)</strong></p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2">
<p><strong>Catches (in tonnes)</strong></p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>Abundance</strong></p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>CPUE</strong></p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>Exploitation rate</strong></p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>Fishing Effort</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Unit</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Unit</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Unit</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Obs_measure</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Unit</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>METADATA</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>1. The reference list of stocks represent at least 60% of the current total national landed and/or reported catch statistics?</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>1a. If answered "No", please specify</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>2. The reference list of stocks contains all stocks of major importance in terms of catch, ecosystem role, economic value, and social/cultural considerations</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>3. Please indicate the frequency of stock assessment</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>3a. If answered "Other", please specify</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>2. If the SDG indicator 14.4.1 is reported in the national SDG portal, database, or other please indicate the address</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>2a. Please provide additional addresses if available</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>4. Any additional information:</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>